Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14
32017R2232
European Union
§ Article 236
Article 236 of the Community Customs Code
(105) FESI and the Footwear Coalition also submitted that the procedure adopted to reopen the investigation and retroactively impose the duty amounts to an abuse of powers by the Commission and violates the TFEU. FESI and the Footwear Coalition argue in this regard that the Commission does not have the authority to interfere with Article 236(1) of the Community Customs Code by preventing the repayment of the anti-dumping duties. They argued that it was up to the national customs authorities to draw the consequences of an invalidation of duties and that they would also be obliged to reimburse anti-dumping duties that had been declared invalid by the Court.
(106) In this regard, FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed that Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation does not allow the Commission to derogate from Article 236 of the Community Customs Code, as both legislations are of an equal legal order and the basic Regulation cannot be seen as a lex specialis of the Community Customs Code.
(107) Furthermore, the same parties continued Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation does not refer to Article 236 of the Community Customs Code and only states that special provisions may be adopted by the Commission, but no derogations to the Community Customs Code.
(108) In response thereto, it is important to underline that Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation does not automatically render applicable the rules governing Union customs legislation to the imposition of the individual anti-dumping duties
See Commission Staff Working Document, Compliance with the judgments of the Court of Justice of 2 February 2012 in Case C-249/10 P Brosmann and of 15 November 2012 in Case C-247/10 P Zhejiang Aokang, accompanying the Proposal for a Council Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd,/ SWD/2014/046 final, at recitals 45-48.
. Rather, Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation gives the Union's institutions the right to transpose and make applicable, where necessary and useful, the rules governing the Union's customs legislation
Case C-382/09 Stils Met, ECLI:EU:C:2010:596, paragraphs 42-43. The TARIC, for instance, which is also used as a vehicle to ensure compliance with trade defence measures, finds its origins in Article 2 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).
.
(109) This transposition does not require a full application of all the provisions of the Union's customs legislation. Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation explicitly envisages special provisions with regard to the common definition of the concept of origin, a good example of where deviation from the provisions of the Union's customs legislation occurs. It is on that basis that the Commission made use of the powers arising from Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation and required that national customs authorities refrain temporarily from any reimbursement. This does not challenge the exclusive competence that national customs authorities have in relation to disputes concerning customs debt: the decision-making authority remains with the customs authorities of the Member States. The Member States customs authorities still decide, on the basis of the conclusions reached by the Commission vis-à-vis the MET and IT claims, whether reimbursement should be granted or not.
(110) Thus, while it is true that nothing in the Union's customs legislation allows for an obstacle to the reimbursement of erroneously paid customs duties to be erected, no such sweeping statement can be made in relation to the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties. Accordingly, and with the overarching necessity to protect the Union's
own resources from unjustified requests for repayment and the related difficulty this would have caused pursuing unjustified repayments thereafter, the Commission had to deviate temporarily from the Union's customs legislation by making use of its powers under Article 14(3) of the basic Regulation.
Lack of statement of reasons on legal basis
(111) FESI and the Footwear Coalition also argued that in violation of Article 296 TFEU, the Commission failed to provide adequate statement of reasons and indication of the legal basis on which duties were reimposed retroactively and therefore the reimbursement of duties denied to the importers concerned by the current implementation. Accordingly, FESI and the Footwear coalition claimed that the Commission had breached the right to effective judicial protection of interested parties.
(112) SIEMES, one of the importers providing comments to the disclosure, also claimed that the Commission Implementing Regulation lacks appropriate reasoning, which is in violation of Article 296 TFEU, however, without further explaining this claim in more detail. In support of its claim this party referred to the judgment in T-310/12 Yuanping Changyuan Chemicals v Council
ECLI:EU:T:2015:295.
.
(113) The Commission considers that the extensive legal reasoning provided in the general disclosure document and in this Regulation, including the reference to the legal bases for the present Regulation, duly motivates the latter.
Legitimate expectations
(114) FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed further that the retroactive correction of expired measures violates the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. FESI argued that first, parties including importers, would have received assurance that the measures expired on 31 March 2011 and that given the time elapsed since the original investigation, parties were entitled to have justified expectations that the original investigation will not be resumed or reopened. Likewise, the Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers were entitled to have justified legitimate expatiations that their MET/IT claims provided in the original investigation would not be reviewed anymore by the Commission, based on the mere fact that these claims were no assessed within the three-month period applicable during the original investigation.
(115) Regarding legitimate expectations of interested parties that anti-dumping measures expired and that the investigation will not be reopened anymore, reference is made to recital 104, where these claims had been addressed in detail.
(116) Regarding the legitimate expectations of Chinese and Vietnamese exporting producers not to have their MET/IT claims reviewed, reference is made to recital 99, where this has equally been addressed in light of the case-law of the Court on this matter.
Principle of non-discrimination
(117) FESI and the Footwear Coalition submitted that the imposition of anti-dumping measures with retroactive effects constitutes discrimination of (i) the importers concerned by the current implementation vis-à-vis importers concerned by the implementation of the Brosmann and Aokang judgments referred to in recital 6 that were reimbursed duties paid on imports of footwear from the five exporting producers concerned by these judgments, as well as (ii) a discrimination of the exporting producers concerned by the current implementation vis-à-vis the five exporting producers concerned by the Brosmann and Aokang judgments which were not made subject of any duty following Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU.
(118) Regarding the claim on discrimination, the Commission recalls first of all the requirements for discrimination, as set out in recital 87.
(119) Then, it is noted that the difference between importers concerned by the current implementation and those concerned by the implementation of the Brosmann and Aokang judgments is that the latter decided to challenge Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 in the General Court, whereas the former did not.
(120) A decision adopted by a Union institution, which has not been challenged by its addressee within the time-limit laid down by the sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, becomes definitive as against him. That rule is based in particular on the consideration that the periods within which legal proceedings must be brought are intended to ensure legal certainty by preventing Union measures which produce legal effects from being called into question indefinitely
Case C-239/99 Nachi Europe, ECLI:EU:C:2001:101, at paragraph 29.
.
(121) This procedural principle of Union law necessarily creates two groups: those which challenged a Union measure and who may have gained a favourable position as a result (like Brosmann and the other four exporting producers), and those who did not. Yet, that does not mean that the Commission has treated the two parties unequally in violation of the principle of equal treatment. An acknowledgement that a party falls into the latter category because of a conscious decision not to challenge a Union measure does not discriminate against that group.
(122) So, all interested parties did enjoy judicial protection in the Union courts at all times.
(123) Insofar as it concerns the alleged discrimination of the exporting producers concerned by the current implementation which were not made subject of any duty following Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU, it should be noted that the decision of the Council not to reimpose duties was clearly taken with regard to the particular circumstances of the specific situation as it stood at the time the Commission made its proposal for the reimposition of those duties and in particular on the grounds that the anti-dumping duties concerned had already been reimbursed, and to the extent that the original communication of the debt to the debtor in question had been withdrawn following the judgments in Brosmann and Aokang. According to the Council, this reimbursement had created legitimate expectations on the part of the importers concerned. Since no comparable reimbursement took place for other importers, these are not in a comparable situation to those importers concerned by the Council decision.
(124) In any event, the fact that the Council chose to act in a certain way, given the particular circumstances of the case before it, cannot bind the Commission to implement another judgment in the exact same way.
Commission's competence to impose definitive anti-dumping measures
(125) In addition, FESI and the Footwear Coalition claimed that the Commission does not have the competence to adopt the Regulation imposing an anti-dumping duty retroactively in the current implementation exercise, and that this competence would in any event lie with the Council. This claim was based on the argument that if the investigation is resumed at the very point at which the illegality occurred, the same rules should also be applicable as the ones at the time of the original investigation, where definitive measures were adopted by the Council. These parties argued that in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 37/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures (also called Omnibus I Regulation)
OJ L 18, 21.1.2014, p. 1.
the new decision-making procedure in the field of the common commercial policy does not apply to the present context given that before the entry into force of the Omnibus I Regulation the Commission (i) had already adopted an act (the provisional Regulation), (ii) the consultations that were required under Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community were initiated and concluded, and (iii) the Commission had already adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation adopting definitive measures. On this basis, these parties concluded that the decision making procedures prior to the entry in force of the Omnibus I Regulation should apply.
(126) That claim, however, focuses on the date of initiation of the investigation (which is indeed relevant in relation to the other substantive amendments that were made to the basic Regulation) but fails to note that Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 uses a different criterion (that is, the initiation of the procedure for adoption of measures). The position of FESI and the Footwear Coalition is therefore based on an incorrect interpretation of the transitional rule in Regulation (EU) No 37/2014.
(127) Indeed, given the reference in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 to procedures initiated for the adoption of measures, which sets out the transitional rules for the changes to the decision-making procedures for the adoption of anti-dumping measures, and given the meaning of procedure in the basic Regulation, for an investigation that was initiated prior to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 37/2014, but where the Commission had not launched the consultation of the relevant committee with a view to adopting measures prior to that entry into force, the new rules apply to the procedure for adopting the said anti-dumping measures. The same holds true for proceedings where measures had been imposed on the basis of the old rules and come up for review, or for measures where provisional duties had been imposed on the basis of the old rules, but the procedure for adopting definitive measures had not been launched yet when Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 entered into force. In other words, Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 applies to a specific procedure for adoption and not to the entire period of a given investigation or even proceeding.
(128) The contested regulation was adopted in 2006. The relevant legislation applicable to this proceeding is Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Therefore, this claim is rejected.
(129) With regard to Clarks et al, it is first claimed that the Commission had no legal basis to investigate the MET/IT claims submitted by exporting producers in the original investigation. Clarks et al argued that the proceeding, which was closed by the expiry of the measures on 31 March 2011, was not invalidated by the judgment in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14, and that therefore, it cannot be reopened.
(130) In reply to this comment, the Commission refers to the explanation provided in recitals 99 to 104.
(131) Second, Clarks et al claimed that the current proceeding is in breach of the principles of non-retroactivity and legal certainty enshrined in Article 10 of the basic Regulation. In addition, SIEMES, another importer of footwear, similarly, claimed that there would be no legal basis for imposition of anti-dumping duties on a retroactive basis and referred to case law, i.e. Case C-458/98 P, Industrie des poudres sphériques v Council
ECLI:EU:C:2000:531.
, and to previous practice of the Commission in this regard.
(132) As to the claim concerning retroactivity based on Article 10 of the basic Regulation and Article 10 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement (WTO ADA), Article 10(1) of the basic Regulation, which follows the text of Article 10.1 of the WTO ADA, stipulates that provisional and definitive anti-dumping duties shall only be applied to products which enter free circulation after the time when the measures taken pursuant to Article 7(1) or 9(4) of the basic Regulation, as the case may be, enter into force. In the present case, the anti-dumping duties in question are only applied to products which entered into free circulation after the provisional and the contested (definitive) Regulation taken pursuant to 7(1) and 9(4) of the basic Regulation respectively had entered into force. Retroactivity in the sense of Article 10(1) of the basic Regulation, however, refers only to a situation where the goods were introduced into free circulation before measures were introduced, as can be seen from the very text of that provision as well as from the exception for which Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation provides.
(133) The Commission also observes that there is neither a violation of the principle of retroactivity, nor a violation of legal certainty and legitimate expectations involved in the present case.
(134) As to retroactivity, the case-law of the Court distinguishes, when assessing whether a measure is retroactive, between the application of a new rule to a situation that has become definitive (also referred to as an existing or definitively established legal situation), and a situation that started before the entry into force of the new rule, but which is not yet definitive (also referred to as a temporary situation).
(135) In the present case, the situation of the imports of the products concerned that occurred during the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 has not yet become definitive, because, as a result of the annulment of the contested Regulation, the anti-dumping duty applicable to them has not yet been definitively established. At the same time, importers of footwear were warned that such a duty may be imposed by the publication of the Notice of Initiation and the provisional Regulation. It is standing case-law of the Union courts that operators cannot acquire legitimate expectations until the institutions have adopted an act closing the administrative procedure, which became definitive.
(136) This Regulation constitutes immediate application to the future effects of a situation that is ongoing: The duties on footwear have been levied by national customs authorities. As a result of the requests for reimbursement, which have not been decided in a definitive way, they constitute an ongoing situation. This Regulation sets out the duty rate applicable to those imports, and hence regulates the future effects of an ongoing situation.
(137) In any event, even if there were retroactivity in the sense of Union law, quod non, such retroactivity would be justified, for the following reason:
(138) The substantive rules of Union law may apply to situations existing before their entry into force in so far as it clearly follows from their terms, objectives or general scheme that such effect must be given to them. In particular, in case C-337/88 Società agricola fattoria alimantare (SAFA), it was held that: [A]lthough in general the
principle of legal certainty precludes a Community measure from taking effect from a point in time before its publication, it may exceptionally be otherwise where the purpose to be achieved so demands and where the legitimate expectations of those concerned are duly respected
ECLI:EU:C:1990:1, paragraph 13.
.
(139) In the present case, the purpose is to comply with the obligation of the Commission pursuant to Article 266 TFEU. Since, in the judgments referred to in recital 12, the Court only found an illegality with regard to the determination of the applicable duty rate, and not with regard to the imposition of the measures themselves (that is, with regard to the finding of dumping, injury, causation and Union interest), the exporting producers concerned could not have legitimately expected that no definitive anti-dumping measures would be imposed. Consequently, that imposition, even if it was retroactive, quod non, cannot be construed as breaching legitimate expectations.
(140) Third, Clarks et al claimed that it would be discriminatory and in breach of Article 266 TFEU to reimpose an anti-dumping duty on the seventy exporting producers concerned, given that no anti-dumping duty was reimposed following the Brosmann and Aokang judgments.
(141) This claim is unfounded. Importers that have imported from Brosman and the other four exporting producers concerned by the judgments in cases C-247/10 P and C-249/10 P, are in a different factual and legal situation, because their exporting producers decided to challenge the contested Regulation and because they were reimbursed their duties, so that they are protected by Article 221(3) of the Community Customs Code. No such challenge and no such reimbursement have taken place for others. See, in this regard, also recitals 118 to 122.
(142) Fourth, Clarks et al alleged that there were several procedural irregularities resulting from this investigation. In the first place, they argued that the exporting producers concerned may no longer be in a position to provide meaningful comments or adduce additional evidence to support their MET/IT claims that they made several years ago. For example, the companies may no longer exist or relevant documents may no longer be available.
(143) In addition, Clarks et al argued that unlike during the original investigation, the Commission's measures would de facto and de jure affect only importers, whereas they have no means of providing any meaningful input and cannot require their suppliers to cooperate with the Commission.
(144) The Commission observes that nothing in the basic Regulation requires the Commission to give exporting companies claiming MET/IT the possibility to complete lacking factual information. In fact, and as set out in recital 88 the burden of proof lies with the producer wishing to claim MET/IT under Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation. The right to be heard concerns the assessment of those facts, but does not comprise the right to remedy deficient information. Otherwise, the exporting producer could prolong indefinitely the assessment, by providing information piece by piece.
(145) In that regard, it is recalled that there is no obligation, for the Commission, to request the exporting producer to complement the MET/IT claim. As mentioned in recital 84, the Commission may base their assessment on the information submitted by the exporting producer. In any event, the exporting producers concerned have not contested the assessment of their MET/IT claims by the Commission, and they have not identified which documents or which people they have no longer been able to rely upon. The allegation is therefore so abstract that the institutions cannot take into account those difficulties when carrying out the assessment of the MET/IT claims. As that argument is based on speculation and not supported by precise indications as to which documents and which people are no longer available and as to what the relevance of those documents and people for the assessment of the MET/IT claim is, that argument is rejected.
(146) Regarding the claim that an importer would have no means to provide any meaningful input, the Commission observes the following: first, importers do not enjoy rights of defence, as the anti-dumping measure is not directed against them, but against the exporting producers. Second, importers had the opportunity to comment on that point already during the administrative procedure prior to the adoption of the contested Regulation. Third, if importers thought that there was an irregularity in that regard, they had to take the necessary contractual arrangements with their suppliers to ensure to dispose of the necessary documentation. Therefore, the claim has to be rejected.
(147) Fifth, Clarks et al argued that the Commission failed to examine whether the imposition of the anti-dumping duties would be in the Union interest and argued that the measures would be against the Union interest because (i) the measures already had their intended effect when first imposed; (ii) the measures would not cause additional benefit for the Union industry; (iii) the measures would not affect the exporting producers and (iv) the measures would impose an important cost on the importers in the Union.
(148) The present case only concerns the MET/IT requests, because this is the only point on which a legal error has been identified by the Union Courts. For Union interest, the assessment in Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 remains fully valid. Furthermore, the present measure is justified in order to protect the financial interest of the Union.
(149) Sixth, Clarks et al claimed that the anti-dumping duty, if reimposed, could no longer be collected because of the statute of limitations of Article 221(3) of the Community Customs Code (now Article 103(1) of the Union Customs Code) had expired. According to Clarks et all, this situation would constitute an abuse of power by the Commission.
(150) The Commission recalls that according to Article 221(3) of the Community Customs Code/103(1) of the Union Customs Code, the statute of limitations does not apply where an appeal pursuant to Article 243 of the Community Customs Code/Article 44(2) of the Union Customs Code is lodged, as in all the present cases, which concern appeals on the basis of Article 236 of the Community Customs Code/Article 119 of the Union Customs Code. An appeal within the meaning of Article 103(3) of the Union Customs Code, pursuant to the clarification in Article 44(2) of the same regulation, extends from the initial challenge to the decision by the national customs authorities imposing the duties up to the final judgment rendered by the national court, including, where necessary, a reference for a preliminary ruling. The three year period is consequently stayed from the date the challenge is filed.
(151) Lastly, Clarks et al claimed that, following the expiry of paragraph 15(a)(ii) of China's WTO Protocol of Accession on 11 December 2016, the Commission can no longer rely on the methodology used to determine normal value for Chinese exporters in the original investigation (i.e. the analogue country methodology under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation).
(152) The contested regulation was adopted in 2006. The relevant legislation applicable to this proceeding is the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union. Therefore, this claim is rejected.
(153) In addition, SIEMES argued that the length of the procedure in relation to its ongoing reimbursement request of anti-dumping duties before the German customs authorities violates the right of good administration under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. First, the Commission notes that decisions over repayment of the anti-dumping duties fall within the competence of the national customs authorities of the Member States. Second, the Commission understood from the information provided to it that SIEMES' reimbursement request of 19 March 2012 was rejected because the judgment pursuant to which it lodged its reimbursement request was limited to Brosmann and Aokang. The judgment had no effect vis-à-vis other exporting producers in China and Vietnam. Only on 4 February 2016 did the Court of Justice declare, in Joined Cases C-659/13 C & J Clark International Limited and C-34/14 Puma SE, the contested Regulation invalid in so far as it concerned all exporting producers of the product concerned (see recital 12). It is only at this point that SIEMES was concerned by a judgment of the Court, as duly notified to it by the German customs authorities in their letter of 7 September 2016. The Commission implemented the judgment vis-à-vis a number of exporting producers as described in recitals 18 to 38, as well as vis-à-vis the importers requesting reimbursement claims before the German customs authorities. In particular, as regards imports subject to reimbursement claims notified to the Commission by the German customs authorities in accordance with Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 (reference is made to recital 30), the Commission fully respected the eight month time limit for implementation set out in Article 1(2) of that Regulation. The Commission, accordingly, disagreed with the argument that this procedure violated the principle of good administration. This claim had therefore to be rejected.
D.
CONCLUSIONS
(154) Having taken account of the comments made and the analysis thereof, the Commission concluded that the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to China and Vietnam, i.e. 16,5 % and 10 % respectively, should be reimposed for the period of application of the contested Regulation.
(155) As mentioned in recital 28, the Commission suspended the assessment of the companies listed in Annex III of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423 until the importer claiming reimbursement from national customs authorities has informed the Commission of the names and addresses of the exporting producer(s) from which the relevant traders purchased footwear, or where no reply is received within that period of time, the expiry of the deadline set by the Commission for providing that information.
(156) In Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2017/423 the Commission also instructed the relevant national customs authorities not to reimburse the customs duties collected until the Commission has finalised the assessment of the relevant MET/IT claims.
(157) As a consequence, as mentioned in recital 29, Pentland Brands Ltd, Puma UK Ltd and Deichmann Shoes UK Ltd came forward and identified their suppliers. The Commission analysed the MET/IT claims of the suppliers identified in the current Regulation. It follows that the Commission finalised the assessment of the situation of the companies listed in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2017/423. As a result, for companies listed in Annex III of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423, the Commission has no record that these companies submitted any MET/IT claim form in the original investigation. The relevant reimbursement claim of the importers should therefore not be granted because the contested Regulation has not been annulled as far as they are concerned. For ease of reference, the Commission has reproduced Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2017/423 as Annex VI to this Regulation.
E.
DISCLOSURE
(158) The exporting producers concerned, the importers that were concerned by notification of the customs authorities of Germany and the Netherlands, the importers that came forward providing the names and addresses of their respective suppliers in China and/or Vietnam as well as all other parties that came forward were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the reimposition of the definitive anti-dumping duty on exports of the 70 exporting producers concerned. They were granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to disclosure.
(159) This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
- A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, excluding sports footwear, footwear involving special technology, slippers and other indoor footwear and footwear with a protective toecap, originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by the exporting producers listed in Annex II to this Regulation and falling within CN codes: 64032000, ex64033000
By virtue of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 301, 31.10.2006, p. 1) this CN code is replaced on 1 January 2007 by CN codes ex64035105, ex64035905, ex64039105 and ex64039905.
, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000
As defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 286, 28.10.2005, p. 1). The product coverage is determined in combining the product description in Article 1(1) and the product description of the corresponding CN codes taken together.
which took place during the period of application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009. The TARIC codes are listed in the Annex I to this Regulation.
- For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
sports footwear shall mean footwear within the meaning of subheading note 1 to Chapter 64 of Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005
OJ L 286, 28.10.2005, p. 1.
;
footwear involving special technology shall mean footwear having a CIF price per pair of not less than EUR 7,5, for use in sporting activities, with a single- or multi-layer moulded sole, not injected, manufactured from synthetic materials specially designed to absorb the impact of vertical or lateral movements and with technical features such as hermetic pads containing gas or fluid, mechanical components which absorb or neutralise impact, or materials such as low-density polymers and falling within CN codes ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998;
footwear with a protective toecap shall mean footwear incorporating a protective toecap with an impact resistance of at least 100 joules
The impact resistance shall be measured according to European Norms EN345 or EN346.
and falling within CN codes: ex64033000
By virtue of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 301, 31.10.2006, p. 1) this CN code is replaced on 1 January 2007 by CN codes ex64035105, ex64035905, ex64039105 and ex64039905.
, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000;
slippers and other indoor footwear shall mean such footwear falling within CN code ex64051000.
- The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Union-frontier price of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the exporting producers listed in Annex II to this Regulation shall be 16,5 % for the Chinese exporting producers concerned and 10 % for the Vietnamese exporting producer concerned.
Article 2
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 shall be definitively collected. The amounts secured in excess of the definitive rate of anti-dumping duties shall be released.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 December 2017.
For the Commission
The President
Jean-Claude Juncker
Annex
ANNEX I
TARIC codes for footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather as defined in Article 1
a)
From 7 October 2006:
6403300039, 6403300089, 6403511190, 6403511590, 6403511990, 6403519190, 6403519590, 6403519990, 6403591190, 6403593190, 6403593590, 6403593990, 6403599190, 6403599590, 6403599990, 6403911199, 6403911399, 6403911699, 6403911899, 6403919199, 6403919399, 6403919699, 6403919899, 6403991190, 6403993190, 6403993390, 6403993690, 6403993890, 6403999199, 6403999329, 6403999399, 6403999629, 6403999699, 6403999829, 6403999899 and 6405100080
b)
From 1 January 2007:
6403510519, 6403510599, 6403511190, 6403511590, 6403511990, 6403519190, 6403519590, 6403519990, 6403590519, 6403590599, 6403591190, 6403593190, 6403593590, 6403593990, 6403599190, 6403599590, 6403599990, 6403910519, 6403910599, 6403911199, 6403911399, 6403911699, 6403911899, 6403919199, 6403919399, 6403919699, 6403919899, 6403990519, 6403990599, 6403991190, 6403993190, 6403993390, 6403993690, 6403993890, 6403999199, 6403999329, 6403999399, 6403999629, 6403999699, 6403999829, 6403999899 and 6405100080
c)
From 7 September 2007:
6403510515, 6403510518, 6403510595, 6403510598, 6403511191, 6403511199, 6403511591, 6403511599, 6403511991, 6403511999, 6403519191, 6403519199, 6403519591, 6403519599, 6403519991, 6403519999, 6403590515, 6403590518, 6403590595, 6403590598, 6403591191, 6403591199, 6403593191, 6403593199, 6403593591, 6403593599, 6403593991, 6403593999, 6403599191, 6403599199, 6403599591, 6403599599, 6403599991, 6403599999, 6403910515, 6403910518, 6403910595, 6403910598, 6403911195, 6403911198, 6403911395, 6403911398, 6403911695, 6403911698, 6403911895, 6403911898, 6403919195, 6403919198, 6403919395, 6403919398, 6403919695, 6403919698, 6403919895, 6403919898, 6403990515, 6403990518, 6403990595, 6403990598, 6403991191, 6403991199, 6403993191, 6403993199, 6403993391, 6403993399, 6403993691, 6403993699, 6403993891, 6403993899, 6403999195, 6403999198, 6403999325, 6403999328, 6403999395, 6403999398, 6403999625, 6403999628, 6403999695, 6403999698, 6403999825, 6403999828, 6403999895, 6403999898, 6405100081 and 6405100089
Annex
ANNEX II
List of exporting producers for which imports a definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed
Name of the exporting producerTARIC additional codeAiminer Leather Products Co., Ltd (Chengdu — China)A999Best Health Ltd (Hou Jei Dong Wong — China)A999Best Run Worldwide Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Bright Ease Shoe Factory (Dongguan — China) and related companies Honour Service (Taipei – Taiwan) and Waffle Shoe ManufacturingA999Cambinh Shoes Company (Lai Cach — Vietnam)A999Dong Anh Footwear Joint Stock Company (Hanoi — Vietnam)A999Dong Guan Bor Jiann Footwear Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Dongguan Hongguo Shoes Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Dongguan Hopecome Footwear Co, Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Dongguan Houjie Baihou Hua Jian Footwear Factory (Dongguan — China)A999Dongguan Qun Yao Shoe Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China) and related company Kwan Yiu Co. LtdA999Dongyi Shoes Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999Doozer (Fujian) Shoes Co., Ltd (Jinjiang, Fujian — China)A999Emperor (VN) Co., Ltd (Tinh Long An — Vietnam)A999Everlasting Industry Co., Ltd (Huizhou — China)A999Freetrend Industrial Ltd (China) (Shenzhen — China)A999Freeview Company Ltd (Shenzhen — China)A999Fu Jian Ching Luh Shoes Co., Ltd (Fuzhou — China)A999Fu Jian Lion Score Sport Products Co., Ltd (Fuzhou — China)A999Fujian Footwear & Headgear Import & Export (Holdings) Co., Ltd (Fuzhou — China)A999Fujian Jinjiang Guohui Footwear & Garment Co., Ltd (Chendai, Jinjiang Fujian — China)A999Gan Zhou Hua Jian International Footwear Co., Ltd (Ganzhou — China)A999Golden Springs Shoe Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Haiduong Shoes Stock Company (Haiduong — Vietnam)A999Hangzhou Forever Shoes Factory (Hangzhou — China)A999Hua Jian Industrial Holding Co., Ltd (Kowloon — Hong Kong) and related company Hua Bao Shoes Co., LtdA999Huu Nghi Danang Company (HUNEXCO) (Da Nang — Vietnam)A999
Hwa Seung Vina Co., Ltd (Nhon Trach — Vietnam)A999Jason Rubber Works Ltd (Kowloon — Hong Kong) and related company New Star Shoes FactoryA999Jinjiang Hengdali Footwear Co., Ltd (Jinjiang, Fujian — China)A999Jinjiang Xiangcheng Footwear and Plastics Co., Ltd (Jinjiang, Fujian — China)A999JinJiang Zhenxing shoes & plastic Co., Ltd (Jinjiang, Fujian — China)A999Juyi Group Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999K Star Footwear Co., Ltd (Zhongshan — China) and related company Sun Palace Trading LtdA999Kangnai Group Wenzhou Lucky Shoes and Leather Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999Khai Hoan Footwear Co., Ltd (Ho Chi Minh city — Vietnam)A999Lian Jiang Ching Luh Shoes Co., Ltd (Fuzhou — China)A999Li-Kai Shoes Manufacturing Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999New Star Shoes Factory (Dongguan — China)A999Ngoc Ha Shoe Company (Hanoi — Vietnam)A999Nhi Hiep Transportation Construction Company Limited (Ho Chi Minh city — Vietnam)A999Ophelia Shoe Co., Ltd (Dongguan — China)A999Ormazed Shoes (Zhao Qing City) Ltd (Zhaoqing — China)A999Ormazed Shoes Ltd (Dong Guan) (Dongguan — China)A999Pacific Joint — Venture Company (Binh Duong — Vietnam)A999Phuc Yen Shoes Factory (Phuc Yen — Vietnam) and related company Surcheer Industrial Co., LtdA999Phuha Footwear Enterprise (Ha Dong — Vietnam)A999Phuhai Footwear Enterprise (Haiphong — Vietnam)A999Phulam Footwear Joint Stock Company (Ho Chi Minh City — Vietnam)A999Putian Dajili Footwear Co., Ltd (Putian — China)A999Right Rich Development VN Co., Ltd (Binh Duong — Vietnam)A999Saigon Jim Brother Corporation (Binh Duong — Vietnam)A999Shenzhen Harson Shoes Ltd (Shenzhen — China)A999Shunde Sunrise (II) Footwear Co., Ltd (Foshan — China) and related company Headlines Int LtdA999Splendour Enterprise Co., Ltd (Nhon Trach — Vietnam)A999Stellar Footwear Co., Ltd (Haiduong — Vietnam)A999Sung Hyun Vina Co., Ltd (Binh Duong — Vietnam) and related company Sung Hyun Trading Co. LtdA999
Synco Footwear Ltd (Putian — China)A999Thai Binh Shoes Joint Stock Company (Binh Duong — Vietnam)A999Thang Long Shoes Company (Hanoi — Vietnam)A999Thanh Hung Co., Ltd (Haiphong — Vietnam)A999Thuy Khue Shoes Company Ltd (Hanoi — Vietnam)A999Truong Loi Shoes Company Limited (Ho Chi Minh City — Vietnam)A999Wenzhou Chali Shoes Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999Wenzhou Dibang Shoes Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999Wenzhou Gold Emperor Shoes Co., Ltd (Wenzhou — China)A999Xiamen Sunchoose Import & Export Co., Ltd (Xiamen — China)A999Xingtaiy Footwear Industry & Commerce Co., Ltd (Guangzhou — China)A999Zhuhai Shi Tai Footwear Company Limited (Zhuhai — China)A999Zhuhai Shun Tai Footwear Company Limited (Zhuhai — China)A999
Annex
ANNEX III
List of companies notified to the European Commission for which there is no record of MET/IT claims
2kelly Asia Ltd
A Plus
A.T.G. Sourcing Limited NL
also spelled ATG Sourcing Ltd
Admance Australia Pty Ltd
Agrimexco
Aider Company
Alsomio International Co. Ltd
Am Shoe Company
Amparo (Hk) Industry Limited
An Thinh Footwear Co. Ltd
An Thinh Shoes Company Ltd
Applause Shoes Co. Ltd
Aquarius Corporation
Ara Shoes (China) Co. Ltd
Asco General Suppliers (Far East) Ltd
Asiatec Industrial Limited
Betafac Industries Ltd
Bk Development Ltd
Bongo Enterprise
Bonshoe International Co. Ltd
Boxx Shoes
Brimmer Footwear Co. Ltd
(Guangzhou) C T N Footwear Co. Ltd
Calstep International Co.
Capital Bright Int Trading Services Ltd
Champ Link
Champion Footwear Mfg Co. Ltd
Chanty Industrial
Chen You Industries Co. Ltd
Chen Zhou Xin Chang Shoes Co. Ltd
Chenwell Co., Ltd
Chenyun Industry Development Ltd
Chiao Hong Shoes Co., Ltd
Chiao Hong Shoes Factory
China Arts & Crafts Nanhing I/E Corp Hanzhou Branch
China Guide Enterprises Limited
China Shenzhen Yuhui Import & Export Co. Ltd
China Sourcing Trading Co.
Chinook Products Co. Ltd
Chris Sports Systems
Chung Phi Enterprises Corp.
Clarion
Cong Hua Sheng Fu Shoes Co. Ltd
Continuance Vietnam Footwear Co. Ltd
Courtaulds Footwear
Denise Style Co., Ltd
Dong Guan Chang An Sha Tou Chi Long Shoes Factory China
Dong Guan Chang An Xiao Bian Seville Footwear Factory
Dong Guan Da Tian Shoes Co. Ltd
Dong Guan Shine Full Co. Ltd
Dong Guan Surpassing Shoes Co., Ltd
Dong Guan Yue Yuen Mfg. Co.
Dong Hung Industrial Joint Stock Company
Dongguan Chang An Xiao Bian Xin Peng Footwear Factory (also known as Seville)
also notified as: Dongguan Chang An Xiao Bian Seville Footwear Factory (Seville = Xin Peng)
Dongguan China Lianyun Footwear Manu-Facturing Co. Ltd
Dongguan Da Ling Shan Selena Footwear Factory
Dongguan Energy Shoe Co.
Dongguan Golden East Shoe Co. Ltd
Dongguan Houjie Santun Chen You Shoes Factory
Dongguan Lian Zeng Footwear Co. Ltd
also spelled Dongguan Liaan Zeng Footwear Co. Ltd China
Dongguan Lianyun Footwear Manu-Facturing Co. Ltd
Dongguan Liao Bu Lian Ban You Wu Handbag Factory
Dongguan Liao Bu Yao Hui Shoes Fty
Dongguan Max Footwear Co. Limited
Dongguan Medicines and Health Products Import and Export Corporation Limited Of Guang Dong
Dongguan Nan Cheng China Full Bags Mfs. Fty.
Dongguan Shi Fang Shoes Co. Ltd
Dongguan Tongda Storage Serve Co. Ltd
Dongguan Ying Dong Shoes Co. Ltd
Dongguan Yongyi Shoes Co. Ltd
Donguan Chaoguan Footwear Ltd
Earth Asia Ltd
East City Trading Ltd
East Rock Limited
Eastern Load International Llc
E-Teen Market Ltd
Eternal Best Industrial Limited
Ever Credit China
Ever Credit Pacific Ltd
Ever Grace Shoes Vietnam Co. Ltd
Everco International
Ever-Rite International
Evervan
Evervan Deyang Footwear Co., Ltd
Evervan Golf
Evervan Qingyuan Footwear Co., Ltd
Evervan Qingyuan Vulcanized
Evervan Vietnam
Fabrica De Sapatos K
Fh Sports Agencies Ltd
Focus Footwear Co., Ltd
Focus Shoe Trading
Footwear International Germany Gmbh
Footwear Sourcing Company
Fortune Footwear Co. Ltd
Fortune Success Footwear Co. Ltd
Foshan Nanhai Nanbao Shoes Factory Ltd
Foshan Nanhai Shyang Ho Footwear Co. Ltd
also spelled Shyang Ho Footwear Ltd
Four Star Shoes Co.
Freedom Trading Co. Inc
Fuh Chuen Co. Ltd
Fujian Putian Shuangchi Sports Goods
Fujian Putian Sunrise Footwear Limited
also spelled Putian Sunrise Footwear Limited
Fujian Quanzhou Dasheng Plastic
Fujian Quanzhoutianchen Imp.& Exp.Trading Corp.
Fuqing Fuxing Plastic Rubber Products Co. Ltd
Fuqing Shengda Plastic Products Co., Ltd
Fuqing Xinghai Shoes Limited Company
Fuzhou B.O.K. Sports Industrial Co. Ltd
Fuzhou Simpersons Int. Trading Co. Ltd
Fuzhou Unico Trading Co. Ltd
Gain Strong Industrial Ltd
Gao Yao Chung Jye Shoes Ltd
also spelled Gaoyao Chung Jye Shoes Manufacturer
Gasond Asia Limited
Gcl Footwear
Get Ever International Ltd
G-Foremost Co. Ltd
Giai Hiep Co. Ltd
Globe Distribution Co. Ltd
Golden Power Ind. Ltd
Golden Sun Joint Stock Company
Grace Master Limited
Great Union Manufacturing Ltd
Greenery Eternal Corporation
Greenland
Greenland Footwear Manufacturing Co. Ltd
Greenland Int. Ltd
Greenland International
Greenland Lian Yun
Gs (Gain Strong) Footwear Co. Ltd
Guang Xi Simona Footwear Co. Ltd
Guangdong Foreign Trade Imp.+Exp. Corp.
Guangdong Luxfull Shoes Co. Ltd
Guanglong Leather Goods Limited
Guangu Footwear Co. Ltd
Guangzhou Ecotec Tootwear Corporation Ltd
Guangzhou Ever Great Athertic Goods Co. Ltd
Guangzhou Guanglong Leather Goods Ltd
Guangzhou Panyu Xintaiy Footwear Industry & Commerce Co. Ltd
Guangzhou Peace Union Footwear Co. Ltd
Haili Import and Export Trading
Hainam Company Limited
Hangzhou Kingshoe Co. Limited
Hao Sheng Shoes Factory
Hao Sheng Shoes Factory
Haoin-Mao-Mao Import-Export Co. Ltd
He Shan Chung O Shoes
Heshan Heng Da Footwear Co. Ltd
Heshan Shi Hengyu Footwear Ltd
High Hope Int'L Group Jiangsu Foodstuffs Imp & Exp Corp. Ltd
Hison Vina Co., Ltd
Holly Pacific Ltd
Hong Kong Ko Chau Enterpise Limited
Hopecome Enterprises Limited
Houjie Santun Cheng Yu Shoes Factory
Hr Online Gmbh
Hsin Yih Footwear Co. Ltd
Huang Lin Footwear Co. Ltd
Huey Chuen (Cambodia) Co., Ltd
Huey Chuen Shoes Group
Huidong County Fucheng Shoes Co. Ltd
Hung Huy Co
Hung Thai Co., Ltd
Huy Phong Ltd Company
Idea (Macao Commercial Offshore) Ltd
Innovation Footwear Co. Ltd
Intermedium Footwear
Intermedium Shoes B.V.
International Shoe Trading Ltd
J&A Footwear Co. Ltd
J.J Trading Co., Ltd
Jangchun Shoe Manufacturing
Jascal Company Ltd
Jaxin Factory
Jeffer Enterprise Corp.
Ji Tai Leather Goods Co. Ltd
Jia Hsin Co. Ltd
Jimmy & Joe International Co., Ltd
Jinjiang Landhiker
Jou Churng Shoes Co. Ltd
Jws International Corp
Kaiyang Vietnam Co., Ltd
Kamkee
Kaoway Sports Ltd
Kim Duc Trading-Producting Co. Ltd
Kimberly Inc. Ltd
also spelled Kimberley Inc Ltd
Ku Feng Shoes Factory
Lai Sun Enterprise Co. Ltd
Leader Global Co. Ltd
Legent Footwear Ltd
Lei Yang Nan Yang Shoes Co. Ltd
Leung's Mi Mi Shoes Factory Co. Ltd, Dongguan China
Lian Yun
Lian Zeng Footwear Co. Ltd
Lianyang Trading Co
Lianyun Footwear Manufacturing Co. Ltd
Link Worldwide Holdings Ltd
Longchuan Simona Footwear Co. Ltd
Longshine Industries Ltd
Lucky Shoes Factory
Madison Trading Ltd
Maggie Footwear Trading Co. Ltd
Mai Huong Co. Ltd
Main Test Inc
Manzoni Trading Ltd
Marketing&Service 2000
Maru Chuen (Cambodia) Corp. Ltd
Maru Chuen Corp.
also spelled Maru Chuen (East City)
Master Concept Group Inc.
Mega International Group
Mega Power Co. Ltd
Mega Union Shoes
Memo B.V.
Metro & Metro
Mfg Commercial Ltd
Minh Nghe Trading & Industrial Co., Ltd
Mode International Inc.
Nam Po Footwear Ltd
Nanhai Yongli Shoes Co. Ltd
New Allied Com. Limited
New Concord Investment Ltd
Nice Well Holdings Limited
Niceriver Development Ltd
Niceriver Shoes Factory
Ningbo Dewin Internat. Co. Ltd
Nisport International Ltd
Ocean Ken International Ltd
O-Joo International Co., Ltd
O'leer Ind, Vietnam
Orces
Oriental Max Group
Oriental Sports Industrial Co. Ltd
also spelled Oriental Sports Industrial Vietnam Co. Ltd
Osco Industries Limited
Osco Vietnam Company Limited
P.W.H. Oriental Limited
Panyu Force Footwear Co. Ltd
Park Avenue Sport
Parramatta Shu Haus Limited
Perfect Footwear International Co., Ltd
Perfect Global Enterises Ltd
Perfect Insight Holdings Ltd
Performance Plus Co.
Phuoc Binh Company Ltd
Planet Shoe S.R.O.
also spelled Planet
Pou Hong (Yangzhou) Shoes
Pro Dragon Inc
Pro-Agenda Int'l Co. Ltd
Programme
Programme International
Protonic (Xiamen) Shoe Co., Ltd
Pt. Horn Ming Indonesia
Putian City Weifeng Footwear Co., Ltd
Putian Dongnan Imp.& Exp. Trading Co. Ltd
Putian Elite Ind.&Trading Co. Ltd
also spelled Putian Elite Industry and Trading Co., Ltd
Putian Hengyu Footwear Co. Ltd
Putian Licheng Xinyang Footwear Co. Ltd
Putian Wholesome Trading Co. Ltd
Putian Xiecheng Footwear Co. Ltd
Qingdao Yijia Efar Import & Export Co. Ltd
Quanzhou Hengdali Import & Export Co. Ltd
Quanzhou Zhongxing International Trading Co. Ltd
Quingdao Korea Sporting Goods
Quoc Bao Co. Ltd
Rainbow Global
Rapid Profit International Ltd
Rayco Shoes Corp
Reno Fashion & Shoes Gmbh
Rib-Band Shoes Factory
Rich Shine International Co., Ltd
Rick
Rick Asia (Hong Kong) Ltd
Rieg
Rieg Und Niedermayer
Right Source Investments Ltd
Rollsport Vietnam Footwear Co. Ltd
also spelled Dongguan Roll Sport Footwear Ltd
Rong Hui Shoes Designing Service Centre
Run International Ltd
Run Lifewear Gmbh
S H & M
S.T.C. Universal Holding Ltd
Samsung Uk
San Jia Factory Sanxiang Town
San Jia Shoes Factory
Sanchia Footwear Co. Ltd
Savannah
Selena Footwear Factory
Seng Hong Shoes (Dong Guan) Co. Ltd
Seville Footwear
also spelled Footwear Factory
Seville Footwear Factory
Shanghai Hai Cheng Economic and Trade Corp Ltd
Shen Zhen Jinlian Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzen Kalinxin Imports & Exports Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Huachengmao Industry Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Chuangdali Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Debaoyongxin Import Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Fengyuhua Trade Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Ganglianfa Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Guangxingtai Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Jieshixing Commerce Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Jin Cheng Zing Industry
Shenzhen Jin Hui Glass Decal Industrial Ltd Company, Great Union Manufacturing Ltd
Shenzhen Jinlian Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Jiyoulong Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Maoxinggyuan Industry Ltd
also spelled Shenzhen Maoxingyuan Industry Ltd
Shenzhen Minghuida Industry Development Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Ruixingchang Import & Export Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Sanlian Commercial & Trading Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Seaport Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Shangqi Imports-Exports Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Sky Way Industrial Ltd
Shenzhen Tuochuang Imp. & Exp. Trading Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Weiyuantian Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yetai Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yongjieda Import & Export Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yongxing Bang Industry Co. Ltd
also spelled Shenzhen Yongxingbang Industry Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yongxingbang Industry Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yuanxinghe Import & Export Trade Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Yun De Bao Industry Co., Ltd
Shenzhen Zhongmeijia Imports & Exports Co. Ltd
Shenzhen, Shunchang Entrance Limited
Sherwood
Shezhen Luye East Industry Co. Ltd
Shin Yuang Shoe Factory
Shinng Ywang Co
Shiny East Limited
Shishi Foreign Investment
Shishi Longzheng Imp.& Exp. Trade Co. Ltd
also spelled Shishi Longzheng Import And Export Trade Co
Shoes Unlimited
Shoes Unlimited B.V.
Shyang Way
Sichuan Pheedou International Leather Products Co., Ltd
Sichuan Topshine Import & Export
Simona
Simona Footwear Co. Ltd
Sincere Trading Co. Ltd
Sopan (Quanzhou) Import & Export Trading Co. Ltd
Sports Gear Co. Ltd
Sportshoes
Spotless Plastics (Hk) Ltd
Startright Co. Ltd
Stc Universal
Stella-Seville Footwear
Sun & Co
Sun & Co. Holding Ltd
Sun Shoes Factory
Sundance International Co. Ltd
Sunlight Limited — Macao Commercial Offshore
Sunny-Group
Super Trade Overseas Ltd
Supremo Oriental Co. Ltd
Supremo Shoes And Boots Handels Gmbh
T.M.C. International Co. Ltd
Tai Loc
Tai Yuan Trading Co. Ltd
Tam Da Co., Ltd
Tata South East Asia Ltd
Tendenza
Tendenza Schuh-Handelsges. Mbh
Tgl Limited
The Imports And Exports Trade Ltd Of Zhuhai
The Look (Macao Commercial Offshore) Co. Ltd
Thomas Bohl Vertriebs Gmbh
Thomsen Vertriebs Gmbh
Thong Nhat Rubber Company
Thuong Thang Production Shoes Joint Stock Company
Ting Feng Footwear Co. Ltd
Tong Shing Shoes Company
Top China Enterprise
Top Sun Maufacturing Co. Ltd
Trans Asia Shoes Co. Ltd
Transat Trading Ag
Trend Design
Trident Trading Co. Ltd
Tri-Vict Co., Ltd
Truong Son Trade And Service Co. Ltd
Uni Global Asia Ltd
Universal International
Vanbestco Ltd
Ven Bao Shoes Research Development Department
Vietnam Samho Co. Ltd
Vietnam Xin Chang Shoes Co. Ltd
Vinh Long Footwear Co., Ltd
also spelled Long Footwear Company
Wearside Footwear
Well Union
Wellness Footwear Ltd
Wellunion Holdings Ltd Dg Factory
Wenling International Group
Wenzhou Cailanzi Group Co. Ltd
Wenzhou Dingfeng Shoes Co. Ltd
Wenzhou Dinghong Shoes Co., Ltd
Wenzhou Hanson Shoes
Wenzhou Hazan Shoes Co., Ltd
also spelled Wenzohou Hazan Shoes Co., Ltd
Wenzhou Jiadian Shoes Industry Co. Ltd
Wenzhou Jinzhou Group Foreign Trade Ind. Co. Ltd
Wenzhou Thrive Intern. Trading Co. Ltd
Wenzhou Xiongchuang Imp.& Exp. Co. Ltd
Winpo Industries
Wolf Shoe Trading Co.
Wuzhou Partner Leather Co. Ltd
Xiamen C&D Light Industry Co.Ltd
Xiamen Duncan Amos Sportswear Co. Ltd
Xiamen Jadestone Trading Co. Ltd
Xiamen Li Feng Yuan Import And Export Co. Ltd
Xiamen Luxinjia Import & Export Co. Ltd
Xiamen Suaring Arts & Crafts Imp./Exp. Co. Ltd
Xiamen Suntech Imp. & Exp. Company Ltd
Xiamen Unibest Import & Export Co. Ltd
Xiamen Winning Import & Export Trade Co. Ltd
Xiamen Xindeco Ltd
Xiamen Zhongxinlong Import And Export Co. Ltd
Xin Heng Cheng Shoe Factory
Xin Ji City Baodefu Leather Co. Ltd
Yancheng Yujie Foreign Trade Corp Ltd
Yangxin Pou Jia Shoe Manufacturing Co., Ltd
Yih Hui Co. Ltd
Yongxin Footwear Co. Ltd
Yongzhou Xiang Way Sports Goods Ltd (Shineway Sports Ltd)
Yu Yuan Industrial Co. Ltd
Yue Chen Shoes Manufacturer Factory
Yy2-S3 Adidas
Zheijang Wenzhou Packing Imp.& Exp.Corp.
Zhejianc Mayu Import And Export Co. Ltd
Zhejiang G&B Foreign Trading Co., Ltd
Zhong Shan Pablun Shoes
Zhong Shan Profit Reach Ent. Ltd
Zhong Shan Xiao Kam Feng Lan East District Rubber & Plastic Factory
Zhongshan Greenery Eternal Corp
Zhongshan Paolina Shoes Factory
Zhongshan Xin Zhan Shoe Company
Zhongshan Zhongliang Foreign Trade Development Co. Ltd
Zhucheng Maite Footwear Co., Ltd
also spelled Zucheng Majte Footwear Co. Ltd
Annex
ANNEX IV
List of exporting producers notified to the Commission already assessed individually or as part of a company group selected in the sample of exporting producers
Apache
Company No 32
Dona Bitis Imex Corp
Dongguanng Yue Yuen
Fitbest Enterprises Limited
Fuguiniao Group Ltd
Haiphong Leather Products And Footwear Company
also spelled Haiphong Leather Products and Footwear One Member Limited Company Co.
Pou Chen Corporation
Pou Yuen Industrial (Holdings) Ltd
Pou Yuen Vietnam Company Ltd
Pou Yuen Vietnam Enterprises Ltd
Pouyen Vietnam Company Ltd
Pt. Pou Chen Indonesia
Sky High Trading
Sun Kuan (Bvi) Enterprises Limited
also spelled Sun Kuan Enterprise
Sun Kuan J.V. Co.
Sun Sang Kong Yuen Shoes Pty (Huiyang) Ltd
also spelled Sun Sang Korn Yuen Shoes Fty (Huiyang) Co. Ltd and Sun Sang Kong Yuen Shoes Fity. Co. Ltd
Zhong Shan Pou Yuen Bai
Zhong Shan Pou Yuen Manufacture Company
also spelled Zhongshan Pou Yuen Manufacture Company
Annex
ANNEX V
List of exporting producers notified to the Commission already assessed either individually or as part of a company group in the context of Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU or in Implementing Regulations (EU) 2016/1395, (EU) 2016/1647, (EU) 2016/1731, (EU) 2016/2257, (EU) 2017/423 or (EU) 2017/1982
Name of the exporting producerRegulation where it was assessedAn Loc Manufacture ConstructionImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Anlac Footwear Company (Alsimex)Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Best Royal Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Brookdale Investments LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Brosmann FootwearImplementing Decision 2014/149/EUBuildyet ShoesImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Chengdu SunshineImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2257Da Sheng (Bvi) InternationalImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Da Sheng Enterprise CorporationImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Diamond Group International LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1731Diamond Vietnam Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1731Dongguan Shingtak Shoes Company LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1982
Dongguan Stella Footwear Co. Ltd
also spelled Duangguan Stella Footwear Co. Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Dongguan Texas Shoes Ltd CoImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Footgearmex Footwear Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1731Freetrend Industrial A (Vietnam) Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647
Freetrend Industrial Ltd
also spelled Freetrend Industrial Ltd (Dean Shoes)
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Freetrend VietnamImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Fujian Sunshine Footwear Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2257Fulgent Sun Footwear Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647General FootwearImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1731
General Shoes Co. Ltd
also spelled General Shoes Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647
Genfort Shoes Ltd
also spelled Gaoyao Chung Jye Shoes Manufacturer
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647 and (EU) 2016/1731
Golden Chang Industrial Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423
Golden Star Company Limited
also spelled Golden Star Co. Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Golden TopImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Golden Top Company LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Guangzhou Hsieh Da Rubber LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Guanzhou Pan Yu Leader Shoes CorpImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Happy Those International LimitedImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Hopeway Group LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Hsin-Kuo Plastic IndustrialImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647
Hung Dat Company
also spelled Hung Dat Joint Stock Company
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Jianle FootwearImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Kimo WeihuaImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Kingfield International LtdImplementing Regulations (EU) 2016/1731 and (EU) 2016/1647
Kingmaker
also spelled Kingmaker (Zhongshan) Footwear Co., Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Lac Cuong Footwear Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Lac Ty Company LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647
Lai Lin Footwear Company
also spelled Lai Yin Footwear Company
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647
Lien Phat Comp. Ltd
also spelled Lien Pat Comp. Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Long Son Joint Stock CompanyImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1982Lung Pao Footwear LtdImplementing Decision 2014/149/EU
Maystar Footwear
also spelled Maystar Footwear Co., Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Mega Star Industries LimitedImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Miri FootwearImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423 and (EU) 2016/1647
Novi Footwear
also spelled Novi Footwear (F.E.) Pte.Ltd
Implementing Decision 2014/149/EUPacific Footgear CorporationImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423
Panyu Pegasus Footwear Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Sao Viet Joint Stock CompanyImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Shoe Majesty Trading Company (Growth-Link Trade Services)Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Stella Ds3Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395
Stella Footwear Company Ltd
also spelled Dongguan Stella Footwear Co. Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Stella International LimitedImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395
Strong Bunch
also spelled Strong Bunch Int'l Ltd
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Strong Bunch Yung-Li Shoes FactoryImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Taiway SportsImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395TathaImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Texas Shoe IndImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423
Thien Loc Shoe Co. Ltd
also spelled Thien Loc Shoes Jointstock Company (Hochimin City/Vietnam)
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Thrive Enterprice Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Tripos Enterprises IncImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Ty Hung Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1731Vietnam Shoe MajestyImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Vinh Thong Producing-Trading — Service Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423
Vmc Royal Co., Ltd
also spelled Royal Company Ltd (Supertrade)
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647Wei Hua Shoes Co. LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395Wincap Industrial LimitedImplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423Zhongshan Wei Hao Shoe Co., LtdImplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395
Zhongshan Glory Shoes Industrial Co. Ltd
also spelled Zhongshan Glory Shoes Co. Ltd (= Zhongshan Xin Chang Shoes Co. Ltd)
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423
Annex
ANNEX VI
List of companies whose examination was suspended pursuant to Article 3 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/423 and for which there is no record of MET/IT claims:
Alamode
All Pass
Allied Jet Limited
Allied Jet Limited C/O Sheng Rong F
American Zabin Intl
An Thinh Footwear Co. Ltd
Aquarius Corporation
Asia Footwear
Bcny International Inc.
Besco Enterprise
Best Capital
Branch Of Empereor Co. Ltd
Brentwood Fujian Industry Co. Ltd
Brentwood Trading Company
Brown Pacific Trading Ltd,
Bufeng
Bullboxer
C and C Accord Ltd
Calson Investment Limited
Calz.Sab Shoes S.R.L.
Carlson Group
Cd Star
Chaozhou Zhong Tian Cheng
China Ever
Coral Reef Asia Pacific Ltd
Cult Design
Dhai Hoan Footwear Production Joint Stock Company
Diamond Group International Ltd/Yong Zhou Xiang Way Sports Goods Ltd
Dong Guan Chang An Xiao Bian Sevilla
Dong Guan Hua Xin Shoes Ltd
Dongguan Qiaosheng Footwear Co
Dongguan Ta Yue Shoes Co. Ltd
Dongguan Yongxin Shoes Co. Ltd
Eastern Shoes Collection Co. Ltd
Easy Dense Limited
Enigma/More Shoes Inc.
Evais Co., Ltd
Ever Credit Pacific Ltd
Evergiant
Evergo Enterprises Ltd C/O Thunder
Fh Sports Agencies Ltd
Fijian Guanzhou Foreign Trade Corp
Foster Investments Inc.
Freemanshoes Co. Ltd
Fu Xiang Footwear
Fujian Jinmaiwang Shoes & Garments Products Co. Ltd
Gerli
Get Success Limited Globe Distributing Co. Ltd
Golden Steps Footwear Ltd
Goodmiles
Ha Chen Trade Corporation
Hai Vinh Trading Comp
Haiphong Sholega
Hanlin (Bvi) Int'l Company Ltd C/O
Happy Those International Ltd
Hawshin
Heshan Shi Hengyu Footwear Ltd
Hiep Tri Co. Ltd
Hison Vina Co. Ltd
Holly Pacific Ltd
Huey Chuen Shoes Group/Fuh Chuen Co. Ltd
Hui Dong Ful Shing Shoes Co. Ltd
Hunex
Hung Tin Co. Ltd
Ifr
Inter — Pacific Corp.
Ipc Hong Kong Branch Ltd
J.C. Trading Limited
Jason Footwear
Jia Hsin Co. Ltd
Jia Huan
Jinjiang Yiren Shoes Co. Ltd
Jou Da
Jubilant Team International Ltd
Jws International Corp
Kai Yang Vietnam Co. Ltd
Kaiyang Vietnam Co. Ltd
Kim Duck Trading Production
Legend Footwear Ltd also spelled as Legent Footwear Ltd
Leif J. Ostberg, Inc.
Lu Xin Jia
Mai Huong Co. Ltd
Mario Micheli
Masterbrands
Mayflower
Ming Well Int'l Corp.
Miri Footwear International, Inc.
Mix Mode
Morgan Int'l Co., Ltd C/O Hwashun
New Allied
New Fu Xiang
Northstar Sourcing Group Hk Ltd
O.T. Enterprise Co.
O'lear Ind Vietnam Co. Ltd also spelled as O'leer Ind. Vietnam Co. Ltd
O'leer Ind. Vietnam Co. Ltd
Ontario Dc
Osco Industries Ltd
Osco Vietnam Company Ltd
Pacific Best Co., Ltd
Perfect Global Enterprises Ltd
Peter Truong Style, Inc.
Petrona Trading Corp
Phuoc Binh Company Ltd
Phy Lam Industry Trading Investment Corp
Pop Europe
Pou Chen P/A Pou Sung Vietnam Co, Ltd
Pou Chen Corp P/A Idea
Pou Chen Corp P/A Yue Yuen Industrial Estate
Pro Dragon Inc.
Puibright Investments Limited T/A
Putian Lifeng Footwear Co. Ltd
Putian Newpower International T
Putian Xiesheng Footwear Co
Quan Tak
Red Indian
Rick Asia (Hong Kong) Ltd
Right Source Investment Limited/Vinh Long Footwear Co., Ltd
Right Source Investments Ltd
Robinson Trading Ltd
Rubber Industry Corp. Rubimex
Seng Hong Shoes (Dong Guan) Co. Ltd
Seville Footwear
Shanghai Xinpingshun Trade Co. Ltd
Sheng Rong
Shenzhen Guangyufa Industrial Co. Ltd
Shenzhen Henggtengfa Electroni
Shining Ywang Corp
Shishi
Shishi Longzheng Import And Export Trade Co. Ltd
Shoe Premier
Simonato
Sincere Trading Co. Ltd
Sinowest
Slipper Hut & Co
Sun Power International Co., Ltd
Sunkuan Taichung Office/Jia Hsin Co., Ltd
Sunny
Sunny Faith Co., Ltd
Sunny State Enterprises Ltd
Tbs
Tendenza Enterprise Ltd
Texas Shoe Footwear Corp
Thai Binh Holding & Shoes Manufac
Thanh Le General Import-Export Trading Company
Thuong Tang Shoes Co. Ltd
Tian Lih
Tong Shing Shoes Company
Top Advanced Enterprise Limited
Trans Asia Shoes Co. Ltd
Triple Win
Trullion Inc.
Truong Son Trade And Service Co. Ltd
Tunlit International Ltd- Simple Footwear
Uyang
Vietnam Xin Chang Shoes Co.
Vinh Long Footwear Co. Ltd
Wincap Industrial Ltd
Wuzhou Partner Leather Co. Ltd
Xiamen Duncan — Amos Sportswear Co. Ltd
Xiamen Luxinjia Import & Export Co.
Xiamen Ocean Imp&Exp
Xiamen Unibest Import And Export Co. Ltd
Yangzhou Baoyi Shoes
Ydra Shoes
Yongming Footwear Factory
Zhong Shan Pou Shen Footwear Company Ltd
Zigi New York Group
Metadata
- Type
- Forordning
- År
- 2017
- Ikrafttrædelsesdato
- 1. januar 1970